24.5 C
New York
Monday, July 28, 2025
Home Blog Page 22

Ex-DOJ employees tied to Jan. 6 cases sue Trump admin for 'unlawful' terminations

0



Three former Justice Department (DOJ) employees hit the Trump administration on Thursday with a lawsuit alleging wrongful termination.

The effort was led by former federal prosecutor Michael Gordon, who worked on top cases related to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. The complaint was also signed by Patricia Hartman, a former public affairs specialist within the U.S. attorney’s office, and Joseph Tirrell, who previously led DOJ’s Departmental Ethics Office.

In the court filing, the former employees allege that their firings were “not in accordance with the law,” “contrary to a constitutional right, power, privilege, or immunity” and “in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or short of statutory right.”

This comes amid a wave of approximately 200 terminations at the department amid President Trump’s efforts to shake-up the federal workforce and root out “waste, fraud and abuse.”

“Every time I think we’re at some point when the firings are over, there’s another wave,” Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) said following the mass layoffs. “So, I would predict we’ll see more.”

Attorney General Pam Bondi also fired 20 staffers who worked on special counsel Jack Smith’s team, including cases related to Trump’s retainment of classified documents after leaving the White House and his alleged the efforts to remain in power after losing the 2020 election to former President Biden.

The plaintiffs argue in the lawsuit that Bondi did not have the authority to remove DOJ employees without due process, pointing to guardrails that are in place to protect employees from “unlawful” termination.

They added later in the complaint that “employees should be protected against arbitrary action, personal favoritism, or coercion for partisan political purposes.”

Gordon, a former assistant U.S. attorney was fired by Bondi without an explanation on June 27. 

“The law requires that the government cannot fire a federal prosecutor without first giving warning and then giving a justification, a reason — merit-based reason for firing,” the lawyer said in an interview with WFLA

He was terminated the same day as two other assistant U.S. attorneys who also worked on Jan. 6 cases were fired. This indicated that the termination “was retaliation for prosecutions that were perceived as politically affiliated,” the lawsuit reads.

Hartman, who handled some communication related to the Jan. 6 cases, was fired on July 7 in the middle of her workday. Her memorandum of termination cited that she was let go due to Article II of the Constitution, without further explanation. 

Tirell, a U.S. Navy veteran, was terminated on July 11, once again without prior warning, according to the lawsuit. 

“The senseless terminations at the Justice Department are growing exponentially. The very institution created to enforce the law is trampling over the civil service laws enacted by Congress. It’s shameful, and it’s devastating the workforce,” said Stacey Young, executive director of Justice Connection, an DOJ alumni organization trying to protect their colleagues, in a statement to The Hill. 

The DOJ did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Union Pacific, Norfolk Southern explore potential merger

0


Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern are currently in advanced discussions regarding a potential merger, both companies have confirmed.

The outcome of these discussions remains uncertain, and no guarantees can be made about the finalisation of any agreement, they insisted.

Both Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern have indicated that they will refrain from further comments or updates on the matter unless they deem it necessary to disclose information or if circumstances change.

The proposed merger would establish a $200bn coast-to-coast rail company, as well as create the first modern West-to-East single-line freight railroad.

It could transform how goods such as grains, chemicals and autos are transported across the country.

If completed, the deal would merge Union Pacific’s dominant position in the western two-thirds of the US with Norfolk Southern’s 19,500-mile network that spans 22 eastern states.

This development has also led competitors BNSF, owned by Berkshire Hathaway, and CSX to consider their merger options, according to Reuters sources.

The primary regulatory obstacle to the merger is obtaining approval from the Surface Transportation Board (STB), the regulatory body responsible for approving M&As in the railways sector.

In 2001, the STB implemented stricter merger regulations following a series of rail deals that reduced the number of major railroads from 36 before deregulation in 1980 to five.

Union Pacific operates across 23 western states, providing essential freight services that connect communities and businesses to the global market.

In 2024, Union Pacific announced plans to invest $3.4bn in infrastructure, rolling stock, and technology, as outlined in its capital plan.

Norfolk Southern operates a freight network spanning 22 states and manages around seven million carloads each year, covering a wide range of products from agricultural goods to consumer items.

“Union Pacific, Norfolk Southern explore potential merger” was originally created and published by Railway Technology, a GlobalData owned brand.

 


The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.

Teens detained for murder of boy on Woolwich bus

0


Two teenagers have been given life sentences for murdering 14-year-old Kelyan Bokassa who was attacked with machetes on a bus in south-east London.

Aspiring rapper Kelyan Bokassa was fatally stabbed on a route 472 bus in Woolwich, south-east London, on 7 January.

He had been sitting on the back seat of the bus on the upper deck when the two youths boarded and attacked him with identical “lengthy machetes” while smiling, the Old Bailey heard.

The defendants, now 16, previously pleaded guilty to Kelyan’s murder and possessing a knife. They were both sentenced to serve a minimum term of 15 years and 10 months.

The court was told the youths appeared to have been tipped off that Kelyan was on the bus before they boarded.

Members of the public sobbed loudly and hid their faces as footage of the attack on Kelyan was shown in court, while the defendants gave no visible reaction in the dock.

Arizona woman sentenced over North Korea tech-worker fraud scheme

0



An Arizona woman was sentenced to more than eight years in prison on Thursday after she pleaded guilty to helping North Korean tech workers secure remote jobs with hundreds of U.S. firms using false identities.

Christina Marie Chapman, 50, of Litchfield Park, Ariz., helped North Korean workers gain IT positions at 309 U.S. businesses as part of a scheme that reaped in more than $17 million, mostly for Pyongyang, according to a Justice Department statement.

The department said much of the income was falsely reported to the IRS and Social Security Administration using the names of actual U.S. citizens, who had their identities stolen or borrowed. The scheme created false tax liabilities for 68 Americans whose identities were compromised, according to the DOJ.

“The impacted companies included a top-five major television network, a Silicon Valley technology company, an aerospace manufacturer, an American car maker, a luxury retail store, and a U.S media and entertainment company,” the DOJ said in its release.

In the wake of the scheme, U.S. Attorney Jeanine Ferris Pirro urged companies to be more vigilant when vetting remote workers.

“North Korea is not just a threat to the homeland from afar. It is an enemy within. It is perpetrating fraud on American citizens, American companies and American banks. It is a threat to Main Street in every sense of the word,” Pirro said in a statement.

“The call is coming from inside the house. If this happened to these big banks, to these Fortune 500, brand name, quintessential American companies, it can or is happening at your company. Corporations failing to verify virtual employees pose a security risk for all. You are the first line of defense against the North Korean threat,” she added. 

Last year, the Justice Department made multiple arrests in connection to foreign remote workers who gained U.S. employment with stolen identities. 

In response to the latest scheme, U.S. District Court Judge Randolph D. Moss ordered Chapman to serve three years of supervised release in addition to the 102-month prison sentence.

She will also be required to forfeit nearly $285,000 that was to be paid to the North Koreans and pay a judgement of more than $175,000.

Chapman pleaded guilty on Feb. 11 in the District of Columbia to conspiracy to commit wire fraud, aggravated identity theft and conspiracy to launder monetary instruments, the DOJ said.

Valero Energy reports decline in Q2 2025 profits

0


Valero Energy has declared net income attributable to its stockholders of $714m, equating to $2.28 per share, for the second quarter of 2025 (Q2 2025).

This figure represents a decrease from net income of $880m, or $2.71 per share, for the same period in the previous year.

The renewable diesel segment, including the Diamond Green Diesel joint venture, experienced an operating loss of $79m, contrasting with operating income of $112m in Q2 2024.

The refining segment, however, showed resilience with operating income of $1.3bn for Q2 2025, a slight increase from $1.2bn in Q2 2024.

Valero chairman, CEO and president Lane Riggs said: “We delivered solid financial results for the second quarter, driven by our strong operational and commercial execution.

“In fact, we set a record for refining throughput rate in our US Gulf Coast region in the second quarter, demonstrating the benefits of our investments in growth and optimisation projects.”

The Ethanol segment reported operating income of $54m, a decrease from the $105m recorded in the previous year.

General and administrative expenses rose to $220m, up from $203m in Q2 2024.

Net cash from operating activities stood at $936m in Q2 2025, encompassing an unfavourable effect of $325m from changes in working capital.

Adjusted net cash provided by operating activities, excluding certain items, was $1.3bn.

Capital investments reached $407m, with the majority allocated to sustaining the business.

The company continued to return value to stockholders, with $695m returned in Q2 through dividends and share repurchases.

Quarterly cash dividend on common stock was announced at $1.13 per share, payable on 2 September 2025.

Lane Riggs said: “We remain committed to maintaining our track record of commercial and operational excellence, which has been a hallmark of Valero’s strategy for over a decade.

“Our commitment remains underpinned by a strong balance sheet that also provides us plenty of financial flexibility.”

The company also repaid a $251m outstanding principal balance of its senior notes and ended the quarter with $8.4bn of total debt and $4.5bn in cash and cash equivalents.

Despite the mixed financial performance, Valero is investing in the future with a $230m FCC Unit optimisation project at the St. Charles Refinery, scheduled for completion in 2026.

Valero intends to operate its refineries at a level approaching 94% of their aggregate capacity in Q3.

Earlier in the year, Valero Energy announced the closure of its Benicia and Wilmington refineries in California, citing a challenging regulatory environment and rising costs.

“Valero Energy reports decline in Q2 2025 profits” was originally created and published by Offshore Technology, a GlobalData owned brand.

 


The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.

All eyes on Starmer after French pledge to recognise Palestine

0


The announcement by President Emmanuel Macron of his intention to recognise Palestinian statehood puts huge pressure on Sir Keir Starmer to follow suit.

The French have been itching to take this step for some time.

They were planning to make an announcement some weeks ago but were forced to delay after Israel and the US attacked Iran’s nuclear facilities.

Crucially, France is not recognising a Palestinian state now – it will do so, says Macron, at the United Nations General Assembly in September.

What the French hope is that their announcement will in the meantime generate diplomatic momentum and encourage other nations to join them.

The French president likes to make bold, dramatic plays on the international stage. But it is a gamble.

In particular, he is relying on the UK to follow his lead. When Macron visited Parliament a few weeks ago, he told MPs and peers that “working together to recognise the state of Palestine and to initiate this political moment is the only path to peace”.

One senior French diplomat told me a few days ago that if the UK acted together with France it would convince other countries to join “because two parent members of the UN Security Council (UNSC) shows we mean business”. The US, China and Russia are the other permanent members on the UNSC, with ten other countries elected for two-year terms.

They added: “The best contribution that France and the UK can bring is to restart the process by bringing all stakeholders around the table, making commitments to the state of Palestine and the security of Israel. We have this power, this opportunity together to restart this process.”

The problem is that the British prime minister has thus far been reluctant to take this step in recognising a Palestinian state.

That, in part, reflects traditional British policy. The UK has long argued that the act of recognising a Palestinian state should not be wasted on what some see as gesture politics. One senior source questioned what impact the French decision would have apart from making Macron feel better.

Instead, officials argue this diplomatic card should be used productively to drive momentum in a long-term political settlement; a lever with which to get a deal over the line.

In other words, recognition was part of the end game. Such is the sensitivity about this issue that David Cameron, as foreign secretary, ruffled feathers last year when he even suggested recognition could be brought forward as part of a process and not the final move.

But the French decision suggests they now believe recognition should not be even a stage in a diplomatic sequence but a trigger to open it all up, a shock to the status quo demanded by continued Israeli intransigence and the scale of the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.

The UK has also been cautious traditionally about recognising a Palestinian state for fear of upsetting its allies, the US and Israel, which are firmly opposed to such an idea, believing it to be, in their view, a reward for terrorism. The UK has also been reluctant to invest too much support in an unreformed Palestinian Authority.

So for now the UK has been stalling for time. On Thursday night, the prime minister issued a statement saying: “We are clear that statehood is the inalienable right of the Palestinian people. A ceasefire will put us on a path to the recognition of a Palestinian state and a two-state solution which guarantees peace and security for Palestinians and Israelis.”

In other words, there has to be at the very least a ceasefire before recognition becomes possible.

Foreign Secretary David Lammy told MPs on the International Development committee last week that recognition had to be part of a process towards secure a two-state solution – a political settlement based on two separate states that protect the rights of Palestinians and the security of Israelis.

“No country has a veto on our decisions,” he said. “When and how to recognise is our decision. I am simply making the point that the act of recognition does not get you two states; it is a symbolic act.”

The problem is that, according to UK officials, this decision has moved from the diplomatic sphere to the political. In other words, the government is now under huge pressure from its MPs to act.

Whenever ministers defend the status quo in the House of Commons, they are assailed on all sides by MPs calling for recognition. Joint letters to Downing Street are being written by retired diplomats and coalitions of MPs. The Foreign Affairs Committee has also issued a report backing recognition.

Even Cabinet ministers are joining in. Earlier this week, Health Secretary Wes Streeting told MPs he hoped that the international community would “recognise the state of Palestine while there is a state of Palestine left to recognise”. That raised eyebrows in Whitehall because the formulation strayed firmly outside the official Cabinet position that recognition should come only “at the point of maximum impact”.

So all eyes are now on what the British government decides. If it fails to follow the French lead, it may well risk votes and rebellions in Parliament. One official suggested to me this could well follow welfare reform as the next big issue to trigger a Labour backbench revolt.

The risk is that, alternately, Britain follows France begrudgingly and is dragged into recognition without any significant diplomatic gain. It will have played a one-time card to little avail.

More than 140 countries around the world have already recognised Palestine as a state. Last year, Ireland, Spain, Norway and Slovenia joined them, with minimal impact.

Future political declarations about Palestinian statehood may well be significant. But how much they change the reality in the short term for people on the ground in Gaza is an open question.

Technology can be a lifeline for incarcerated parents

0



Nearly 2.7 million children in America today — roughly the population of Mississippi — have an incarcerated parent. That staggering number is a reminder that incarceration doesn’t only affect individuals but entire families.

And behind the statistics are real people: parents apart from their children, and children navigating life without a primary caregiver.

We come to this issue from different backgrounds. Teresa is a formerly incarcerated mother who co-founded a nonprofit that supports the successful reentry of people returning from incarceration. She knows firsthand the heartache of being separated from family and the immeasurable value of every call, message or moment of connection. Kevin leads a company that offers responsible technology to incarcerated people and their families. We share a commitment to advancing policies and tools that preserve family bonds and support better outcomes. 

Consider this: Of the 1.9 million people currently incarcerated in the U.S., approximately 50 percent have children under age 18. Additionally, between 4 and 5 percent of women entering correctional facilities are pregnant, meaning that the separation begins early and reverberates through families for generations. 

Generationally, children with an incarcerated parent are five to six times more likely to become incarcerated themselves. They bump up against educational barriers, including higher rates of special education placement, reduced school retention, and increased behavioral issues in classrooms. Why? Separation, particularly when sudden and without explanation, can lead to prolonged instability. 

It doesn’t have to be this way. Technology is helping to rewrite this story. Tools such as secure video calls, e-messaging, educational platforms and digital reentry resources allow incarcerated individuals to stay present in their children’s lives. 

Kevin recently visited Bedford Hills Correctional Facility, a women’s facility in New York that runs one of the few prison nursery programs in the country. The women we met expressed a deep appreciation for the technology available to them, especially the tablets they use to stay in touch with their children. They spoke about being able to see their kids, receive pictures and even access parenting content that helps them stay emotionally connected and prepared for reentry.

Many also highlighted that these same tablets give them access to job training and workforce readiness programs — critical tools that allow them to return home more equipped to support their families and build a more stable future. 

The ability to offer support, witness milestones, or simply say “I love you” was not taken for granted. For many of these women, the technology available to them wasn’t just a convenience; it was a lifeline. It helped them maintain hope and a sense of purpose, with the goal of returning home and being there for their families. Experiencing that perspective firsthand was one of the most powerful takeaways from the visit. 

Maintaining those connections isn’t always easy. Many families face challenges that make regular communication feel out of reach. Safe, affordable technology paired with supportive policies and reentry programming like job readiness training and education offer scalable, impactful solutions. Technology is more than a convenience — it is a foundation for connection to stronger families and safer communities. 

We’ve both seen what’s possible when incarcerated individuals are treated as members of families, not just statistics. And we’ve both witnessed how maintaining those bonds, even during incarceration, can change the trajectory of a child’s life. 

Helping families remain connected, especially during one of the most challenging chapters of their lives, changes outcomes. Let’s ensure our policies and technologies support families, strengthen parent-child connections, and improve the impact of incarceration for families when they are apart.  

Kevin Elder is president of Securus Technologies, a technology communications firm serving prisons nationwide. Teresa Hodge is president of Mission: Launch, a nonprofit focused on improving outcomes for Americans with arrest or conviction records. She is chairperson of the Aventiv Technologies Advisory Board. 

MLG Oz secures $10m contract for New Murchison’s Australian gold project

0


Australian miner MLG Oz has been awarded a new contract, valued at up to A$15m ($9.8m), to provide crushing and screening services at New Murchison Gold’s Crown Prince gold deposit in Western Australia (WA).

The agreement, set to commence next month, marks MLG Oz’s first collaboration with New Murchison and will last for an initial period of 30 months, with potential extensions for up to six months.

MLG will provide a mobile crushing plant featuring an automated sampling system and will be responsible for operating and servicing the equipment throughout the duration of the contract.

MLG Oz managing director Murray Leahy said: “We are delighted to have been selected by New Murchison Gold to provide crushing and screening services over the next two to three years as they develop their high-grade gold deposit within their flagship Garden Gully Project.

“We continue to actively expand our crushing and screening capabilities, broadening our reach and market presence across our suite of clients in the gold and iron ore mining sectors.”

The Crown Prince high-grade gold project is part of New Murchison’s Garden Gully Project, which is situated 22km north-west of Meekatharra in WA.

This deal is expected to generate approximately A$500,000 per month in revenue for MLG Oz. It follows a series of new contract wins and extensions for the company, including its first contract with mining giant Rio Tinto and another providing services to Fortescue.

In February, MLG Oz announced a A$75m contract with Westgold Resources for bulk haulage services and the supply of goods and/or services across its southern operations in the WA Goldfields.

“MLG Oz secures $10m contract for New Murchison’s Australian gold project” was originally created and published by Mining Technology, a GlobalData owned brand.

 


The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.

England vs India fourth Test: Washington Sundar dismisses Ollie Pope and Harry Brook

0


Washington Sundar ends Ollie Pope’s 71 run innings before dismissing Harry Brook for three shortly after the lunch interval as England fall to 349-4 on day three of the fourth Test at Old Trafford.

FOLLOW LIVE: England vs India fourth Test – day three

Available to UK users only.

Carville rips Columbia over Trump settlement: 'I’ve never seen such cowards in my life'

0



Democratic strategist James Carville ripped Columbia University for agreeing to pay $221 million to President Trump’s administration to restore the school’s federal funding. 

“You were talking about Paramount and how they collapsed. The biggest cavers in the world is Columbia University,” Carville said during a Thursday night appearance on Fox News’ “Jesse Waters Primetime.” 

“I’ve never seen such cowards in my life. My hat is off to Harvard. At least they have guts,” Carville added.

Columbia University announced on Wednesday that it had agreed to a $200 million settlement with the federal government, which will be paid out over the next three years, and $21 million to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. 

“This agreement marks an important step forward after a period of sustained federal scrutiny and institutional uncertainty,” acting Columbia University President Claire Shipman said. 

“The settlement was carefully crafted to protect the values that define us and allow our essential research partnership with the federal government to get back on track,” Shipman added.

Columbia lost $400 million in federal funding earlier this year after the administration cut it off over a probe into antisemitism on the Ivy League’s campus. The school argues the deal will allow the institution to keep its academic independence. 

President Trump lauded the deal.

“It’s a great honor to have been involved, and I want to thank and congratulate Secretary Linda McMahon, and all those who worked with us on this important deal. I also want to thank and commend Columbia University for agreeing to do what is right,” Trump wrote on social media. “I look forward to watching them have a great future in our Country, maybe greater than ever before!”

Columbia’s deal was criticized by some Democrats in Congress, including school alum Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.). 

“[M]y alma mater has allowed a once highly-respected institution to succumb to the Trump Administration’s coercive and exploitative tactics,” the New York Democrat said. “Columbia has effectively waived the white flag of surrender in its battle at the heart of the Trump Administration’s war on higher education and academic freedom.”