34 C
New York
Monday, July 28, 2025

Instant payments are the new standard: Can banks keep up?


Ten seconds. That’s all it now takes to move money across the eurozone under the SEPA Instant Payments (SEPA IP) initiative. Around the clock, every day of the year, batch processing has become a thing of the past.

SEPA Instant Payments has been around for eight years, and with compliance deadlines looming, transformation is accelerating across EU institutions. October’s requirement for outbound instant eurozone payments is a major catalyst. Yet there’s still a gap between regulatory requirements and operational reality as many European banks are struggling with legacy infrastructure limitations, inconsistent user experiences, and incomplete 24/7 processing capabilities. Meanwhile, non-EU banks are under mounting pressure to keep pace with rising expectations, and modernise their outdated systems.

While non-EU banks may have more time on paper, with the EU giving non-eurozone banks until 2027 to comply with SEPA IP for both sending and receiving payments, that breathing space could be a false comfort. Regulatory lag shouldn’t be mistaken for strategic leeway – customer expectations are already shifting, and the clock is ticking.

Legacy systems were never designed for instant payments. Historically, banking systems operated comfortably on batch processing schedules – downtimes were predictable and maintenance windows were scheduled. Then SEPA IP came along and eliminated such luxuries, mandating a constant readiness that legacy systems cannot sustain.

Unfit technology isn’t the only problem non-EU banks face. Their infrastructure often sits in distant time zones, designed for settlement during their own domestic business hours. Banks now have two gaps they must bridge: the tech chasm between current legacy abilities and where they need to be, and the geographical divide between business and customer. They must work out how to bridge them without sacrificing day-to-day service.

Minor tweaks to legacy systems are inadequate. Ripping out old infrastructure and replacing it with a modern core is largely unworkable, despite any long-term benefits. So, it’s an incremental approach that will help banks bridge these gaps. Incrementally aligning legacy systems with SEPA IP’s 24/7/365 model should be an immediate priority for non-EU banks, allowing them to swiftly meet regulatory deadlines and increased customer expectations without major disruption.

Another consideration for non-EU banks is how real-time transactions fundamentally alter liquidity management. Traditional liquidity frameworks, established around batch processes and fixed settlement windows, now face obsolescence. Yet many banks are still managing liquidity with manual processes and spreadsheets. This won’t work with SEPA IP. Under this new system, liquidity needs are immediate and continuous – demanding dynamic management that legacy systems were never designed to accommodate.

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Stay Connected

0FansLike
0FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe

Latest Articles